Guidelines for Students:[1]
Generative AI has become an increasingly common tool in academic and nonacademic spaces; however, the use of generative AI is not without significant challenges, including academic integrity concerns and ethical issues. As with all student work, it is essential that applicants prepare their materials in ways that are free from plagiarism, represent the author’s own voice, and authentically share the writer’s experiences, skills, background, and thought processes. The applicant should be the sole author of all materials submitted for review in the admissions process. Additionally, it is the responsibility of each applicant to familiarize themselves with any department- or program-specific guidelines regarding the use of generative AI in their application materials.
Specific Guidance for Students[2]:
Applicants should not represent the ideas or work of others, including work completed by generative AI, as their own. The ethical and appropriate use of generative AI in your application might include:
- Using generative AI to search for guidance and general suggestions or information on the application process as well as to assist with research on programs and universities.
- Using generative AI tools to review the grammar and spelling of application materials that you have substantively authored yourself.
- Using generative Ai tools to aid and check translation of single words or phrases in application materials.
The unethical and inappropriate use of generative AI materials in graduate applications might include:
- Using generative AI tools to complete outlines, drafts, or entire written products required in the application process. This includes (but is not limited to) directly copying and pasting content from generative AI output and submitting it as your own original work.
- Using generative AI to translate substantial portions of your application materials from one language into English.
- Using generative AI to fabricate technical skills, letters of recommendation, etc.
While this guidance is specific to generative AI, it mirrors similar ethical guidelines and expectations for how applicants might involve other people in the drafting and creation of their application materials. For example, you might ask an advisor to read and provide comments or suggestions on a statement of purpose; however, it would be inappropriate to ask an advisor or colleague to completely draft your personal statement.
[1] Materials in this section were adapted from resources published by the University of Minnesota (https://grad.umn.edu/guidance-generative-ai-graduate-education), Northwestern University (https://www.northwestern.edu/careers/grad-law-schools/using-ai.html), and the University of Michigan (https://rackham.umich.edu/admissions/applying/guidance-and-policies-related-to-use-of-genai-for-rackham-applicants/).
[2] Materials in this section were adapted from the University of Michigan (https://rackham.umich.edu/admissions/applying/guidance-and-policies-related-to-use-of-genai-for-rackham-applicants/).